Analysis reveals hotspots for conversion are hotspots for
crop insurance payouts
Sara Sciammacco
Environmental Working Group
EWG’s researchers found that over the same time
period, 5.3 million acres, or 8,300 square miles of highly erodible land –
mostly fragile grassland – was also plowed up to grow row crops.
Using modern mapping and geospatial technologies,
researchers documented that the most dramatic loss of wetlands occurred in
three states – South Dakota , North
Dakota and Minnesota
– the core of the critically important Prairie Pothole Region. Exploitation of
highly erodible land is more widespread, with 10 states – Texas, Colorado,
Oklahoma, Montana, North Dakota, Iowa, Missouri, South Dakota, Kansas and
Nebraska – accounting for 57 percent of all the highly erodible land converted
to cropland.
The new analysis, titled, “Going, Going, Gone!”,
is a follow-up to EWG’s widely cited Plowed Under
report, released in 2012, which found that over the same four years, 23.6
million acres of grasslands, wetlands and shrublands had been converted to row
crops.
“By taking a closer look at the data, we were able
to reveal with unprecedented precision the ‘hotspots’ where conversion of large
blocks of fragile land to row crops is most extensive,” said Craig Cox, EWG’s senior
vice president for agriculture and natural resources. “What’s most troubling is
the correlation between these areas and the counties with the highest average
crop insurance payouts.”
In particular, the county-by-county mapping
analysis shows:
● In the 71 counties that lost more than 5,000
acres of wetlands and wetland buffers, the average crop insurance payout was
$10.1 million – more than four times the $2.3 million average across all 3,109
U.S. counties..
● The average crop insurance payout in the 235
counties that were hotspots for conversion of highly erodible land was $5.8
million – two and a half times the national average.
● In the 12 counties that were hotspots for both wetland and highly erodible
land conversion, the average payout was $7.5 million – three times the national
average.
● The total payout in the 294 counties with the
highest rates of conversion of wetlands or highly erodible land was an
astounding $8.3 billion.
“The data strongly suggest that over-subsidized
crop insurance policies are greasing the wheels of conversion to row crops,”
said Cox. “The government is picking up too much of the risk of plowing up and
planting fragile land, all at a cost of billions of dollars to taxpayers and
untold environmental degradation.”
Taxpayers pay, on average, 60 percent of crop
insurance premiums, and in some cases the entire cost. However, premium
subsidies are not subject to the same conservation requirements that apply to
other farm programs.
The pending Senate-passed version of the farm bill
would ensure that farmers take basic steps to protect land in exchange for
receiving taxpayer-funded crop insurance subsidies and reduce those subsidies
for landowners who plow up native prairie and grassland; the House version
would not.
The EWG report also shows just how effective this
simple conservation quid pro quo would be in slowing down wetland
conversion and protecting millions of acres of fragile land.
It concludes, “Strengthening the conservation
compact is the single most important action Congress could take to halt the
environmental disaster taking place as millions of acres of environmentally
sensitive land go under the plow.”
No comments:
Post a Comment